|
The following Public Notices are related to lawsuits and other
litigation, as well as injunctions:
Ball v. Biedess Court Order
AHCCCS is making public, at least annually beginning
on August 15, 2005, information considered in the
development of the Home and Community Based Services (HCBS)
rate setting (rebasing).
(Posted 9/1/2006)
Factors Considered During the 2004-2005 Rebasing of
Fee-For-Service (FFS) Rates
Factors in the rebasing included Medicare rates, private sector
rates, costs for delivery services, any economic factors unique to
Arizona and current level of supply and demand. The rebasing effort also
included information about home care workers' current wage levels and
benefits. [..Details, [PDF, 89
Kb]]
(Posted 8/18/2006)
Fee-For-Service Rate and Wage Survey Update
HCBS Fee-for-Service Rate Setting Policy [..Details,
[PDF, 15 Kb] (Posted 09/01/2006)
2008
HCBS Fee-for-Service rates effective for October 1, 2008 and a
summary of factors considered for rate revisions [..Details,
[PDF, 15 Kb]]
(Posted 08/26/2006)
Wage and Benefits bi-annual survey results 2008 [..Details,
[PDF, 14 Kb]]
(Posted 08/26/2006)
2007
HCBS Fee-for-Service rates effective for October 1,
2007 and a summary of factors considered for rate
revisions [..Details, [PDF, 15Kb]]
Wage and Benefits bi-annual survey results 2007 [..Details, [PDF,
14Kb]]
2006
HCBS Fee-for-Service rates effective for October 1,
2006 and a summary of factors considered for rate
revisions [..Details,
[PDF, 13 Kb]]
Wage and Benefits bi-annual survey results [..Details,
[PDF, 15 Kb]]
Co-payment Injunction
On April 20, 2004, the United
States District Court for the District of Arizona
issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting
enforcement of increased co-payments for Medicaid
services as authorized per Laws 2003, Chapter 265,
§ 16. [..Details..]
(Posted 4/23/2004)
Important Information Concerning Co-payment
Injunction
The following notice is provided in
PDF format: Provider
Co-Payment Notice.
(Posted 4/21/2004)
Ekloff v. Rodgers
The Consent Decree in the Ekloff vs. Rodgers litigation regarding
incontinence briefs (diapers) was signed in November 2006. As a result
of this settlement, AHCCCS will cover incontinence briefs (diapers) for
AHCCCS members over 3 years and under age 21 who are incontinent (not in
control of bodily wastes) due to their disabilities. [Details in English]
El Decreto por Consentimiento en el litigo correspondiente los
calzoncillos para incontinencia (panales) fue firmado en noviembre del
año 2006. Como resultado de este acuerdo, AHCCCS cubrirá el costo de los
calzoncillos para incontiniencia (panales) para los miembros de AHCCCS
de más de 3 años y menos de 21años de edad que sean incontinentes (sin
control de su organismo) por causa de sus incapacidades. [Detalles
en Espanol]
[Posted 2/16/2007]
Padilla v. Rodgers
This lawsuit was filed to require AHCCCS to provide
emergency dialysis services to members covered under the
Federal Emergency Services (FES) program. [Details
in English]
Esta acción legal fue sometida para requerir que AHCCCS proporcionará
servicios de diálisis de emergencia a miembros que son cubiertos por el
programa de Servicios Federales de Emergencia (FES). [Detalles
en Espanol]
[Posted 1/3/2007]
|
| 
